Article 3 Assessment/ Tools for the Mind by Mary Burns

Overview: In Tools for the Mind, Mary Burns states that now is a good time to reassess the current application of technology within the schools. Computers have definitely evolved over the years, but so has
the way people use them. Since the early 90's the internet has become a ubiquitous mind tool, but to use it to our benefit (expanding our students critical thinking skills), Burns believes we must first learn how to use it properly. To promote a higher level of thinking teachers must utilize spreadsheets, databases, geographic information systems (GIS), computer-aided design programs, and simulation software programs according to Burns.

Reference Points:
1. By the 90's people thought computers would be utilized as tools for a higher level of critical thinking.
2. There are no statistics that link student technology use to improved learning
3. Administratiors and educators are monitoring the value of computers as instructional tools.
4. Technology can take over passive learning. Students can be empowered by discovering information for themselves.
5. Professional developments can be used to give teachers technical skills, but administration needs to find more ways to help teachers how to use technology to enhance student learning.
6. Many districts lack the following:
* on-site technical support
* long term professional development in technology integration
* sufficient hardware and software
* sufficient instructional time for inquiry-based
* Technical gurus to help teachers understand how to use computers
* computers in general
7. Spreadsheets, databases, GIS, computer-aided design programs, and simulation software programs are tools that encourage higher thinking levels.
8. Power Point and Word applications, commonly used in classrooms are used for simple cognitive tasks.

Reflection: Yes, I think technology needs to be implemented into our schools as much as possible. However, this will cost money many districts don't have. Right now the district I work in lacks in special education. I'm sure they are bending laws left and right by not providing services to students that qualify for specific services. It's all about the money and where administration wants to focus that money. Do they want to boost technology? Well that means funding staff training as well. Maybe teachers could receive CEU's for attending trainings. Or, could administration try to get more grants to fund technology? This way, they could focus budget funds on hiring more teachers to reduce class sizes, and making sure they are abiding by laws in regards to special education.